A federal judge appointed during the Obama administration is facing renewed criticism after declining to impose additional prison time on an undocumented immigrant convicted of sexually assaulting a vulnerable woman in Michigan.
U.S. District Judge Judith Levy sentenced Edys Díaz several years ago after he was convicted in connection with the sexual assault of a woman with cerebral palsy and cognitive impairments. Prosecutors said the victim was particularly vulnerable due to her disabilities. Díaz received a sentence that critics argue was far below what the severity of the crime warranted, and recent court proceedings confirmed the judge will not add additional time related to his immigration violations.
As a result, Díaz could be released in as little as two and a half years, despite the nature of the offense and his unlawful presence in the United States.
During sentencing, Judge Levy cited factors such as Díaz’s family ties and work history, including statements referencing his “family devotion” and willingness to perform labor the court said some Americans decline to do. Those remarks have drawn backlash from victims’ advocates and conservatives, who argue such considerations are irrelevant in cases involving violent crimes.
The decision has reignited debate over immigration enforcement, judicial discretion, and sentencing standards. Supporters of President Donald Trump point to the case as an example of what they describe as a broken system that places offenders ahead of public safety and victims’ rights.
President Trump has repeatedly called for tougher penalties for violent offenders, stricter enforcement of immigration laws, and accountability within the judiciary. His administration has argued that crimes committed by individuals in the country illegally should result in enhanced penalties and immediate removal after incarceration.
